Compositions and methods for improving the quality of processed sperm

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to compositions and methods for the handling of processed sperm including samples that are freshly collected, those transported as fresh samples, samples that are frozen and thawed, those sorted into one or more subpopulations, and those that are otherwise processed or handled that impose trauma on the cell. Trauma can reduce the motility, fertility, viability and overall integrity of the sperm and reduce the ability to fertilize, produce an embryo and a healthy offspring. The present invention relates to novel compounds that can be added to the sperm cell sample to reduce the traumatic effects of physical stress during mild as well as extensive sperm cell processing, methods of using the compounds in standard sperm processing procedures, the end products made from these methods including sperm and embryos, as well as methods of using those end products in assisted reproductive biology techniques in animals.

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Applications 61/492,151 filed Jun. 1, 2011, entitled “Method of sorting sperm cells into one or more subpopulations and methods of treating sperm cells to improve motility;” 61/569,143 filed Dec. 9, 2011, entitled “Methods of handling processed sperm cells to improve their quality;” and 61/570,691 filed Dec. 14, 2011, entitled “Methods of handling processed sperm cells to improve their quality,” the contents of which are all incorporated by reference in their entireties.

The present invention generally relates to compositions and methods for the handling of processed sperm populations, including those freshly collected as well as those sorted into one or more subpopulations, and for treating processed and/or handled semen samples and solutions that contain sperm cells to increase the overall quality of the processed sperm, including their viability, motility, fertility, DNA integrity, and in vitro longevity. The present invention also relates to compositions comprising sperm cells and at least one compound that may be an antioxidant, vitamin or other organic stress reducer, the methods of using these compounds to reduce trauma and stress on processed sperm, the resulting sperm and embryo end products, and the methods of use of these products in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to increase the quality, quantity and viability of embryos, and improved rates of births in animals.

BACKGROUND

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) includes such techniques as in vitro fertilization (IVF), artificial insemination (AI), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (other techniques using enucleated cells) and multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) (as well as other embryo transfer techniques), is used across the animal kingdom, including humans and other animals. ART methods are usually expensive, time consuming and marginally successful given the inherent fragility of gametes and embryos when outside of their natural environments. Furthermore, the use of ART within the animal breeding industry in a commercially feasible manner is additionally challenging due to the limited availability of genetically desirable gametes and zygotes. One way to lower the cost of ART and to improve its commercial feasibility is to increase the efficiency of the involved processes by improving the viability and overall quality of gametes and zygotes. Although there is has been a growing interest in this field over the course of the last decade or so, there still remains a strong need to increase the overall quality of gametes and zygotes for use in ART, especially when breeding focuses on pre-natal gender selection, including improving their viability (in the case of gametes and zygotes), their motility and fertility (in the case of sperm cells), as well as other longevity characteristics.

For example, in conventional AI, one problem limiting its commercial application in certain species is the need to use extremely high number of sperm cells per AI dose to ensure successful fertilization. Similarly, in IVF, the percentage of zygotes that develop into embryos remains frustratingly low; this high rate of loss significantly increases the cost of embryos and related services to end-users. There also remains the need for more efficient and lower cost procedures for improving post-embryo handling through cryopreservation as well as non-frozen transport. Cryopreservation of embryos is limited by the success rate of embryo production as well as blastocyst growth in vitro. Currently, only a marginal percentage of IVF embryos are suitable for cryopreservation which adds to the ongoing high cost of ART procedures.

Especially when processing gametes such as flushed oocytes or sperm cells, both conventional and sex-sorted, before their use in ART adds a tremendous amount of stress on the gamete cell and negatively impacts their cellular integrity and membrane structure which in turn is reflected in decreased viability, motility and fertility. An example of processing gametes prior to their use in ART is the sorting of sperm cells based on sex (known as “gender enrichment” or “sex-sorting”), which is a highly desired procedure to minimize wasted births of the wrong sex for selective breeding in the livestock industry but is often cost prohibitive and can be risky to those with smaller breeding herds.

The popular flow cytometry based sex-sorting process severely stresses and damages the cells and produces a low percentage of useful sperm, which although capable of fertilizing matured oocytes, have reduced viablity, motility and fertility after the sex-sorting process. Typically, sex-sorting involves many harsh steps including but not limited to: the initial collection and handling of sperm ejaculate which naturally starts to deteriorate rapidly upon collection; the staining of sperm cells which involves binding of an excitable dye to the DNA or a harmful membrane selection procedure; the physical sorting of the sperm cells using high energy fluorescence that physically energizes the dye that is bound to the DNA, forced orientation through a narrow orifice, and application of an electrical charge to the cell; the physical collection of the cells into a container which often shocks the fragile cell upon contact; the osmotic stresses associated with dilution of the sperm droplet in collection media; and the storage of the sorted sperm usually by freezing which is well known to raise havoc with the cell's membrane systems. Each step places the processed sperm under abnormal stress which diminishes the overall motility, viability and/or fertility of the sperm. The result can lead to less efficient samples for use in ART, such as IVF and AI, and other types of subsequent or further processing.

Even non-sorted processed sperm exhibits significant losses in fertility, viability and motility when being collected, handled and transported without freezing, and noticeably experiences significant stress when mixed with cryoprotectant and is frozen and thawed. Many in the field have tried to improve methods for the use on unsorted, conventional semen to minimize loss in the handling processes associated with in vitro handling, preservation and use of semen samples.

Regardless of the processing, sperm lose their potential to fertilize when exposed to: elevated temperatures, abnormal buffers, stains, altered pH systems, physical pressurized orientation as when forced through a nozzle or when oscillated to form drops in a flow cytometer, radiation used to illuminate the DNA binding dye, physical stressors associated with separation and collection techniques, cryoprotectants, freezing, thawing and micromanipulation by the handler.

The large class of compounds referred to as antioxidants have been associated with providing beneficial effects to all sorts of cells, in vivo and in vitro, but these effects are as varied as the nature of the antioxidant itself. An antioxidant is simply one of a large variety of molecules that either inhibit the oxidation of another molecule, becomes oxidized itself in place of the target substrate, or binds harmful free radical intermediates and interrupts oxidative chain reactions within a cell. Most have dual roles; some are enzymes, others are non-enzymatic; some others are vitamins and others are cofactors. Such diversity lauds the diversity of antioxidants, but because of their known ability to minimize cell damage, they are frequently lumped together as a single class of compounds having only a single function, to bind free radicals.

Various antioxidants have shown promise in promoting cell integrity with some reports showing positive effects on sperm motility and membrane integrity during cryopreservation, but some tests have been shown to have minimal or even harmful effects on processed sperm.

Similarly, vitamins are again a rather diverse group of molecules having very different biological properties. Vitamins are any of a large group of organic compounds required in very small amounts as vital nutrients for an organism that cannot synthesize it. They can be antioxidants, enzymes, hormones or non-enzymes; they can be regulators of cell growth, cell differentiation or moderators of mineral metabolism.

To date, no studies have sufficiently addressed the use of antioxidants, vitamins or other supplements in the routine handling of fragile gametes during in vitro processing, especially during the harsh processing associated with the sex-sorting of sperm, whereby the end result is a reproducible improvement on the viability, motility and fertility of extensively processed sperm cells and embryos. There remains a continuing need to improve current methods of ART to reduce the cost and to make the procedures more dependable and commercially feasible to those on a tight budget, especially those smaller breeders who view sex-selection breeding as a high risk and expensive option.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A broad object of the present invention is to provide improvements in the motility, viability, fertility and overall integrity of processed sperm cells. Accordingly, one embodiment of the present invention comprises a method of treating sperm cells by adding at least one “organic stress reducing” agent (OSR) which may comprise an antioxidant, a vitamin or other organic molecule involved directly or indirectly in modulating physiological stresses in the cell. The OSR would be added in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml to a sperm cell sample to form a sperm cell composition. In certain embodiments, one or more OSRs, each in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml, can be added to the sperm cell sample prior to cryopreservation (including, for example, freezing and vitrification), after the sperm cell sample has been thawed, or at both times. In other embodiments, the OSR can be added at one or more of the various stages during the sperm cell processing procedure. The term “sperm cell sample” may comprise a processed semen sample or an unsorted, conventional semen sample.

Another specific embodiment of the invention comprises the sperm cell composition comprising a sperm cell sample and at least one OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml. Another embodiment encompasses a “sperm cell composition” comprising a sperm cell sample, at least one OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml and a cryoprotectant. Most cryoprotectants can be used with the invention, including but not limited to egg yolk, propylene glycol, dimethyl sulfoxide, sucrose, ethylene glycol and glycerol, or a combination thereof. One embodiment encompasses a fresh, an unfrozen, a frozen, a vitrified, or a thawed sperm cell composition comprising a sperm cell sample and at least one OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml. Another embodiment encompasses a fresh, an unfrozen, a frozen, a vitrified, or a thawed sperm cell composition comprising a sperm cell sample, at least one antioxidant and/or one vitamin in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml, and a stain.

Another broad object of the present invention is to improve the motility, viability (including longevity and ability to survive environmental stress) and/or fertility of sperm cells, each contributing to the sperm cell's overall integrity, to improve the success of using ART, including techniques such as IVF, AI, ICSI (as well as other techniques using enucleated cells), and MOET (as well as other embryo transfer techniques).

Such ART techniques involve different levels of gamete cell processing which in the case of sperm can entail, by example only and is not limited to one or more of the following: artificially collecting a semen sample from the male animal which may involve natural, electronic or other types of sexual stimulation; holding; transporting; buffering with different pHs; chilling; warming; staining; diluting; concentrating; energetically exciting as with a laser; electronic charging; deflecting; ablating to kill unwanted cells usually with targeted lasers; sorting; collecting; shaking; oscillating; magnetically separating; oxygenating as associated with microchip sorting procedures; labeling; precipitating; centrifuging; resuspending; mixing; dialyzing; cryostabilizing; freezing; vitrification; thawing; culturing; inseminating; microinjecting; microfluidic processing; microchip processing; jet and air processing; flow cytometry processing; and similar handling techniques. Whereas a single processing step may exert only minimal stress on a sperm cell, others or a combination may add significant stress, often killing the cell. An extreme example is the sex-sorting process used to separate X- from Y-chromosome bearing cells; the sorting process combines a large number of independent highly stressful steps that severely compromise the overall integrity of the sorted sperm cell population.

Accordingly, one embodiment of the present invention resides broadly in the use of a sperm cell composition, comprising a sperm cell sample and at least one antioxidant and/or at least one vitamin in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml, in ART. One specific embodiment of the invention comprises a method of increasing the percentage of zygotes that develop into embryos in a given sample in a given amount of time, as well as increasing the percentage of embryos that are suitable for cryopreservation (i.e., the percentage of embryos that are blastocysts, expanded and hatching blastocysts, or hatched blastocysts), by mixing an egg with a sperm cell sample that has been treated with at least one OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml. A further embodiment of the invention resides in a method of making an embryo comprising mixing at least one egg with a sample of sperm cells treated with at least one OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml. The embryos produced by this method constitute a further embodiment of the invention. Another embodiment includes a method for inseminating an organism through an AI technique using a sperm cell sample treated with at least one OSR in the concentration of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml. Another embodiment includes a method of transferring an embryo into a receptive female (ET) where said embryo is made using a sperm cell sample treated with at least one OSR in the concentration of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml. The progeny of the organism that results from the aforementioned AI method also constitutes an embodiment of the invention.

Most embodiments of the invention utilize concentrations of OSRs selected from the following ranges: 0.01 to 5.0 mg/ml; 0.01 to 0.25 mg/ml; 0.01 to 0.5 mg/ml; 0.01 to 1 mg/ml; 0.01 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.01 to 5 mg/ml; 0.05 to 0.1 mg/ml; 0.05 to 1.0 mg/ml; 0.05 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.1 to 0.25 mg/ml; 0.1 to 0.5 mg/ml; 0.1 to 1 mg/ml; 0.1 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.1 to 5 mg/ml; 0.15 to 0.45 mg/ml; 0.15 to 0.5 mg/ml; 0.25 to 0.35 mg/ml; 0.25 to 0.5 mg/ml; 0.25 to 1 mg/ml; 0.25 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.25 to 5 mg/ml; 0.35 to 0.5 mg/ml; 0.35 to 1 mg/ml; 0.35 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.35 to 5 mg/ml; 0.5 to 1 mg/ml; 0.5 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.5 to 5 mg/ml; 1 to 2.5 mg/ml; 1 to 5 mg/ml; about 0.05 mg/ml; about 0.1 mg/ml; about 0.15 mg/ml; about 0.25 mg/ml; about 0.35 mg/ml; about 0.45 mg/ml; and about 0.5 mg/ml.

In some embodiments of the invention the sperm cell composition can be used immediately or processed within the first few minutes after addition of the OSR for whatever processing step is needed, whereby the holding period would be in the range 2 sec to 3 min. In other embodiments, the sperm cell composition is held after the addition of the OSR(s) to allow the OSR(s) to incorporate into the cells and effectuate protective effects on the cell population. Such holding periods can be short, as in the range of a 3-15 minutes, moderate as in the range of 15 min to 1 hr; and longer processing periods ranging up to about 8 hrs or overnight for extensive processing such as with sex-sorting techniques. Transportation hold periods associated with transporting unfrozen sperm cell compositions can be much longer, extending up to a few days, which may for example occur if the sample is collected, treated with the addition of one or more OSRs, transported or shipped to another location possibly by air, and further processed at the second location as for sex-sorting at a designated facility. In other instances, the sperm cell composition might need to be held for a few days while a recipient female is hormonally prepped for artificial insemination, as might occur if a sample is mistakenly thawed and cannot be refrozen. The addition of OSRs could theoretically prolong these extended hold periods over what is currently accepted in the art, and could provide sufficient protection to the sperm in the sperm cell composition so that they could remain viable and fertile for up to a week or more.

In some embodiments of the invention, the OSR is added several times during a complex processing procedure to minimize cell stress throughout the procedure. In other embodiments, the OSR is added only at one or more particular steps which are notably harsh on the cells to help minimize stress and fatigue on the sperm cells. By way of example, the staining process during sex sorting is often performed at non-physiological pH and at elevated temperatures, both known to be harsh on the cells. Similarly, cryopreservation is also extremely harsh on the cells and disrupts cell membranes, both internal and external. Following an intensive multi-step sorting procedure, sex-sorted sperm cells which are already compromised are even more susceptible to cryogenic and freeze processing.

Various OSRs can be used in the context of the current invention, including but not limited to: catalase, superoxide dismutase (SOD), SOD mimics, glutathione, glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase, pyruvate, mercaptoethanol, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), lipoic acid, flavins, quinines, vitamin K (and related vitamers), vitamin B12 (and related vitamers), with ‘vitamers’ defined as compounds having the same vitamin activity (such as cobalamin, cyanocobalamin, methylcobalamin, adenosylcobalamin, hydroxocobalamin, and pseudo-B12), vitamin E (including its vitamers, tocopherols (α, β, γ), tocotrienols, and α-tocopheryl), alpha-ketoglutarate (also known as α-KG, AKG or oxo-glutarate) and various biological forms of AKG (such as arginine, aspartate, lysine, and similar derivatives), other compounds that regulate nitric oxide in the cell including malondialdehyde (MDA) and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and biologically active derivatives thereof.

A further embodiment of the invention comprises a method of sorting a sperm cell sample to form one or more subpopulations comprising the steps of providing a sperm cell sample, sorting the sperm cell sample to form one or more subpopulations and adding at least one OSR to the sperm cell sample during one or more of the aforementioned sorting steps, the concentration of the OSR being in the range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml.

An additional embodiment of the invention encompasses media used in processing sperm cells that comprise at least one OSR at the appropriate stock concentration to be present at a final processing concentration in the range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml in the sperm cell composition at the time of processing. A stress reducing media can be used for different processes including but not limited to sperm collection, artificial insemination, sperm sorting, in vitro fertilization, embryo culture, as well as sperm and embryo freezing. Media used in the sorting of sperm cells typically comprise one or more buffers and/or extenders (i.e., substances that preserve the viability and/or fertility of sperm cells).

Any buffer or buffer solution used in the processing of sperm can be used in the aforementioned media, including but not limited to phosphates, citrates, acetates, lactates, and combinations thereof, or a solution containing a salt, a carbohydrate, or a combination thereof can be employed in some of the embodiments of the invention, such as, but not limited to: Tris, TES, HEPES, TALP, TCA, PBS, citrate, milk and derivatives thereof, as discussed in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,208,265 the contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Any extender used in the processing of sperm can be used in the aforementioned media, including but not limited to energy sources, protein sources and antibiotics and may include one or more of the following: mono- and disaccharides, such as fructose, glucose, mannose, sucrose, and lactose; protein sources, such as egg yolk, milk, BSA and derivatives thereof; and any one of the commonly known antimicrobial or antibiotic agents, such as gentamicin, lincomycin, spectinomycin, their derivatives, or any combination thereof.

As used herein, the term “extender” may also include certain organic substances such as disaccharides, trisaccharides, and any combination thereof, egg yolk, milk, albumin, lecithin, cholesterol, their derivatives and any combination thereof. An extender may also include a detergent that may be an alkyl ionic detergent, such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS).

A further embodiment of the present invention provides a method of improving the motility, viability and/or fertility of a sperm cell sample that has already undergone a sorting process, including but not limited to sex sorting, comprising the step of adding at least one OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml to a sorted sperm cell sample to form a sperm cell composition.

Accordingly, the present invention resides broadly in the use of a sperm cell composition, that in some embodiments comprise a sorted sperm cell sample and at least one OSR in the range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml, for use in ART. A further embodiment encompasses a sperm cell composition comprising sorted sperm cells, at least one OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml and a catch media (i.e., media found in the vessel that receives, or catches, the sorted sperm at the end of the sorting process). Another embodiment encompasses a sperm cell composition comprising a processed or sorted sperm cell sample, an OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml, and a cryoprotectant. An additional embodiment of the invention encompasses a frozen or vitrified sperm cell composition comprising a processed or sorted sperm cell sample, and at least one OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml.

Another broad object of the present invention is to improve the motility, viability (including longevity and ability to survive environmental stress) and fertility of processed and/or sorted sperm cells for use in ART such as IVF, AI, ICSI (as well as other techniques using enucleated cells), and MOET (as well as other embryo transfer techniques).

Accordingly, some of the embodiments of the present invention incorporate the use of sex sorted sperm cells that have had an OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml added to them in ART.

Accordingly, other embodiments of the present invention incorporate the use of a sperm cell composition, a sorted sperm cell sample, and at least one OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml, in ART.

One specific embodiment of the invention comprises a method of increasing the percentage of zygotes that develop into embryos in a given sample in a given amount of time, as well as increasing the percentage of embryos that are suitable for cryopreservation (i.e., the percentage of embryos that are blastocysts, expanded and hatching blastocysts, and hatched blastocysts), by mixing an egg with a sorted sperm cell sample that has been treated with at least one OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml.

A further embodiment of the invention resides in a method of making an embryo comprising mixing at least one egg with at least one sperm cell treated with at least one OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml. The embryos produced by this method constitute a further embodiment of the invention.

Other embodiments of the invention also include, a method for inseminating an organism through an AI technique using a processed or sorted sperm cell sample treated with at least one OSR in the concentration of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml. The progeny of the organism that results from the aforementioned AI method also constitutes an embodiment of the invention. Furthermore, one embodiment of the invention encompasses a method for recovering embryos that are produced from the aforementioned AI method.

Embodiments of the invention can include sperm cells, or spermatozoa, collected from numerous species of male mammals, and the invention should be understood not to be limited to the species of male mammals described by the specific examples within this application. Rather the specific examples within this application are intended to be illustrative of the varied and numerous species of male mammals from which semen can be collected and utilized in certain embodiments of the invention. Embodiments of the invention, for example, may include the sperm cells of humans as well as animals having commercial value for meat or dairy production such as swine, ovine, bovine, equine, deer, elk, buffalo, or the like (naturally the mammals used for meat or dairy production may vary from culture to culture). It may also include the sperm cells of various domesticated mammalian species encompassed by canines and felines, as well as sperm cells of primates, including but not limited to chimpanzees, gorillas, or humans and the spermatozoa from whales, dolphins and other marine mammals. It may also include frozen-thawed sperm cells from all the various mammals above-described and further, including but not limited to, the sperm cells of deceased donors, from rare or exotic mammals, zoological specimens, or endangered species.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order that the invention may be more clearly understood, preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying sheets of drawings wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of part of a flow cytometer illustrating a method of sorting a sperm cell sample into one or more subpopulations according to some embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 2 illustrates a graphical representation of the motility and progressive motility found in Table 1.

FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of the percent blastocysts and percent hatching found in Table 4.

FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the percent blastocysts and percent hatching found in Table 5.

FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the percent motile sperm found in Table 1.

FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of the percent progressively motile sperm found in Table 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect of the present invention, FIG. 1 illustrates in schematic form part of a flow cytometer used in a method to sort a sperm cell sample to form one or more subpopulations, the flow cytometer being generally referenced 10. In this particular embodiment sex sorting is taking place so the subpopulations are X-chromosome bearing sperm cells and Y-chromosome bearing sperm cells. FIG. 1 represents a single technique for sorting semen, but any known technique for sorting cells known in the art can be used with certain embodiments of the invention. Additional details of the basic sperm sorting apparatus and methodology are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,135,759 and 7,371,517, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

Once a sperm cell sample has been collected it can be extended as soon after collection with an extender that includes one or more antioxidants or vitamins. The sample is then typically held at a temperature of about 5° C. for between about 12 hours to about 18 hours while it is being shipped from the collection point to the flow cytometer 10 for the sorting process. This holding temperature can be in the range of between 4° C. and 39° C. and is commonly in the range of 4° C. and 16° C.

Upon arrival at the flow cytometer, the sample is stained with a DNA selective dye and a quenching dye to form a stained sperm cell sample and subsequently placed into a sperm cell source 11 of the flow cytometer 10. The flow cytometer 10 can be programmed by an operator to generate two charged droplet streams, one containing X-chromosome bearing sperm cells, charged positively, 12, one containing Y-chromosome bearing sperm cells, charged negatively 13 while an uncharged undeflected stream of dead cells 14 simply goes to waste.

An operator may also choose to program the flow cytometer in such a manner, that both the X- and Y-chromosome bearing sperm are collected using a “high purity sort” (in other words only live X- and Y-chromosome bearing sperm are collected) or to program the flow cytometer to collect both the X- and Y-chromosome bearing sperm using an “enriched sort” (in other words it will collect droplets containing live that were not previously sorted and excluding all initial dead again by the use of Boolean Gate logic available with the computer that controls the flow cytometer). The Boolean Gate logic can also be used to collect only one of either the X- or Y-chromosome bearing sperm.

Initially, a stream of sperm cells under pressure, is deposited into the nozzle 15 from the sperm cell source 11 in a manner such that they are able to be coaxially surrounded by a sheath fluid supplied to the nozzle 15 under pressure from a sheath fluid source 16. An oscillator 17 which may be present can be very precisely controlled via an oscillator control mechanism 18, creating pressure waves within the nozzle 15 which are transmitted to the coaxially surrounded sperm cell stream as it leaves the nozzle orifice 19. As a result, the exiting coaxially surrounded sperm cell stream 20 could eventually and regularly form droplets 21.

The charging of the respective droplet streams is made possible by the cell sensing system 22 which includes a laser 23 which illuminates the nozzle exiting stream 20, and the light emission of the fluorescing stream is detected by a sensor 24. The information received by the sensor 24 is fed to a sorter discrimination system 25 which very rapidly makes the decision as to whether to charge a forming droplet and if so which charge to provide the forming drop and then charges the droplet 21 accordingly.

A characteristic of X-chromosome bearing sperm is that they tend to absorb more fluorochrome dye than Y-chromosome bearing sperm and as such, the amount of light emitted by the laser excited absorbed dye in the X-chromosome bearing sperm differs from that of the Y-chromo-some bearing sperm and this difference in characteristic tells the sorter discrimination system 25 which charge to apply to droplets containing only X- or only Y-chromosome bearing sperm cells. Dead cells (or those about to die) have absorbed the quenching dye and the sorter discrimination system 25 does not charge droplets containing such cells.

The charged or uncharged droplet streams then pass between a pair of electrostatically charged plates 26, which cause them to be deflected either one way or the other or not at all depending on their charge into respective collection vessels 28 and 29 to form respectively a gender enriched population of X-chromosome bearing and a gender enriched Y-chromosome bearing sperm cells having a DNA selective dye associated with their DNA. The uncharged non-deflected stream containing a sub-population of dead cells (or those that are about to die) go to the waste container 30.

The collected sex sorted sperm cells may then be frozen and stored or frozen and sent on for further processing (or simply used for further processing immediately), further processing meaning for example, the purposes of research or for use in ART such as IVF, AI, ICSI (as well as other techniques using enucleated cells), and MOET (as well as other embryo transfer techniques).

In alternative embodiments not illustrated, the catch media contained in the otherwise empty collection vessels may also contain OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml. The OSR may be added during this stage of the sorting process (be it sex sorting or other form of sorting) and/or in addition to another method step in the sorting (be it sex sorting or other form of sorting) process.

Furthermore, in the alternative embodiments, the OSR administered in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml to the sperm cell sample or composition can be added to the DNA selective dye and/or the quenching dye solutions. Some embodiments include use of one or more OSRs as pre-mixed components of the prepared buffers, extenders, stains, catch fluids, and/or cryo-extenders used in the sex sorting procedure. Accordingly, the OSR may be added to the sperm cell sample at one or more steps during sex-sorting, including when the sperm cell sample is being first handled following collection, and/or stained with a DNA selective dye and/or the quenching dye, and/or at the time of collection from the flow cytometer, and/or later when preparing the sample for cryopreservation by adding the OSR or OSR cocktail to the cryo-extender.

Likewise, some sorting embodiments include sorting of frozen-thawed conventional semen whereby the OSR can be added to the thawed semen sample shortly after thawing and then reverse sorted to produce sex-sorted sperm cell subpopulations which include the addition of an OSR at one or more steps during the extended processing procedure of gender selection.

In some cases, when the sorting of sperm cells is not going to involve sex sorting, a quenching dye without the need for a DNA staining dye may be required, in which case the OSR will only be present in the quenching dye to form the stained sample. In this way, depending on the embodiment chosen, the OSR may again only be added during this stage of the sorting process (be it sex sorting or other form of sorting) or in addition to at least one other method step in the sorting (be it sex sorting or other form of sorting) process.

Again, in the alternative embodiments, the collected sex sorted sperm cells (or in alternative embodiments the sorted, i.e. non-sex sorted sperm cell samples) once frozen will, prior to such further processing, require to be thawed. Either before freezing or upon thawing, the antioxidant, again in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml, may be added to the sample before freezing and/or to the thawed sample. In this way, depending on the embodiment chosen, the OSR may again only be added during this stage of the sorting process (be it sex sorting or other form of sorting) or in addition to at least one other method step in the sorting (be it sex sorting or other form of sorting) process.

In yet further alternative embodiments the time period allowed to elapse after the addition of the OSR, can vary and may be in the range of about 5 seconds to about 72 hours (excluding freezing time and time spent in the freezer or in the cryopreserved state), the lower end of the scale providing for almost immediate sorting of the sperm sample while the upper end of the scale would cover the typical maximum time frame associated with moving a sperm sample from its collection point to its sorting point. This is usually a flight and/or road travel time. More particularly, the time periods may be about 5 seconds to about 3 hours; about 3 hours to about 6 hours; about 6 hours to about 12 hours; about 12 hours to about 18 hours; about 18 hours to about 24 hours; about 24 hours to about 36 hours; about 36 hours to about 48 hours; about 48 hours to about 60 hours; and about 60 hours to about 72 hours; and.

Another alternative embodiment may include the use of an extender within a pH range of 5.5 to 7.8, and frequently at about 6.5; about 6.6; about 6.7; about 6.8; about 6.9; about 7.0; about 7.1; about 7.2; about 7.3; about 7.4; or about 7.5.

As described in the illustrated embodiment, different steps of the method are carried out at different temperatures. In alternative embodiments, at least one of the method steps is carried out within a temperature range selected from the group consisting of about 5° C. to about 15° C.; about 15° C. to about 20° C.; about 20° C. to about 25° C.; about 25° C. to about 30° C.; about 30° C. to about 35° C.; about 35° C. to about 40° C. and about 40° C. to about 45° C. This allows for different steps in the sorting method to be performed within different temperature ranges.

In another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of treating the motility of sperm cells in a sperm cell sample. In this embodiment, the sperm cell sample, which may be a gender enriched population of X-chromosome bearing or Y-chromosome bearing sperm cells having a DNA selective or DNA binding dye associated with their DNA, a sample sorted into one or more subpopulations or a conventional non-sorted sample, the method of treating the motility of the sperm cells in the sperm cell sample comprises the step of adding an OSR in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml to the sperm cell sample to form a sperm cell composition (and in this embodiment at a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml). The OSR which is added forms part of an extender which is in a pH range of 6.5 to 7.5 and in particular embodiments, the pH is selected from the group consisting of about 6.5; about 6.6; about 6.7; about 6.8; about 6.9; about 7.0; about 7.1; about 7.2; about 7.3; about 7.4; and about 7.5.

After the addition of the antioxidant, a time period being in the range of about 5 seconds to about 72 hours is allowed to elapse before the sample undergoes further processing in the form of for example, research or for use in assisted reproductive technologies such as IVF, AI, ICSI (as well as other techniques using enucleated cells), and MOET (as well as other embryo transfer techniques). The time period which is allowed to elapse may be selected from the range consisting of: about 5 seconds to about 3 hours; about 3 hours to about 6 hours; about 6 hours to about 12 hours; about 12 hours to about 18 hours; about 18 hours to about 24 hours; about 24 hours to about 36 hours; about 36 hours to about 48 hours; about 48 hours to about 60 hours; and about 60 hours to about 72 hours. The techniques for fertilizing an egg involve the added step of mixing at least one egg with the sperm cell sample. Any conventional technique such as those listed above can be used with the invention, including any conventional IVF or AI technique. Typical IVF techniques are disclosed in WO/0243486, for example, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Typical AI techniques are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,149,867, for example, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

In alternative embodiments, the sperm cell sample may have been a frozen sample that has been allowed to thaw. The method may further comprise the step of staining the sperm cell sample or the sperm cell composition with a DNA selective dye if the sample is not a sex sorted sample.

The method may also comprise the step of freezing the sperm cell composition to form a frozen sperm cell composition that may be allowed to thaw. At least one of the method steps in this second aspect of the present invention is carried out within a temperature range selected from the group consisting of about 0° C. to about 5° C.; about 5° C. to about 15° C.; about 15° C. to about 20° C.; about 20° C. to about 25° C.; about 25° C. to about 30° C.; about 30° C. to about 35° C.; about 35° C. to about 40° C. and about 40° C. to about 45° C. Thus, each method step may be carried out at a different or similar temperature range.

Suggested Methods

By way of example, the following oocyte maturation procedure, IVF procedure, in vitro culture procedure and co-culture procedure may be used with the invention. One skilled in the art will know that variations on these methods exist and that these methods should not be construed to limit the functionality of the current invention. These methods are illustrative only.

1. Oocyte Collection. Collect slaughterhouse oocytes, wash 1× with about 3 mL Hepes washing media and with 1× with TCM-199 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) +10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS). Culture in maturation media for 22 hrs in a CO₂ incubator at 38.5° C. In one embodiment, the maturation media contains TCM-199, FBS, pyruvate, chorionic gonadotropin (e.g., Chorulon (Intervet, Summit N.J.)), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) (e.g., Folltropin (Bioniche, Belleville, Canada)), estradiol, and at least one antibiotic. In a further embodiment, Amikacin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) can be used as the antibiotic. In another embodiment, the maturation media may also comprise luteinizing hormone.

In one embodiment, the maturation media may comprise 5-20 ml of TCM-199 Earl's; 0.5-2 ml of FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Mass.); 10-30 μl of pyruvate (prepared by adding 0.05-0.20 g of sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to 5-20 ml of saline solution); 50-200 μl of chorionic gonadotropin (prepared by adding 5-20 UI of Chorulon (Intervet, Summit N.J.) to 5-20 ml of TCM-199 Earl's); 5-20 μl of FSH (prepared by adding 0.001-0.01 g of Folltropin (Bioniche, Belleville, Canada) to 5-20 ml of TCM-199 Earl's); 5-20 μl of estradiol (prepared by adding 0.001-0.05 g of estradiol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) to 5-20 ml of Etanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.)); and 10-30 μl Amikacin (prepared by adding 0.1-1 g Amikacin sulfate salt (Sigma-Aldrich) to 20-40 ml of saline solution). In alternative embodiments, the maturation media may comprise the aforementioned components using different volumes but in the same proportion to each other, e.g., in one embodiment, the maturation media may comprise 10-40 ml of TCM-199; 1-4 ml of FBS; 20-60 μl of sodium pyruvate, etc. In a further embodiment, the maturation media comprises the above preparations of TCM-199 Earl's, FBS, pyruvate, chorionic gonadotropin, FSH, estradiol and an antibiotic in the approximate ratio of 9:1:0.02:0.1:0.01:0.01:0.02 by volume, respectively.

2. In Vitro Fertilization. Trim away cumulus cells from matured oocytes. Transfer them to a fertilization dish and return to the CO₂ incubator. Thaw frozen semen straws using standard procedures, centrifuge in 800 μL of Pure Sperm gradient (Nidacon, Molndal, Sweden), or a percoll or similar gradient at 2500 RPM for 10 minutes to remove egg components, glycerol and other debris. Remove supernatant, leaving a loose pellet of live sperm. Combine pellets using a small amount of fertilization media and repellet at 1500 RPM for 3 minutes. Carefully remove supernatant. Then gently mix the pellet. After determining the desired insemination dose, inseminate the oocytes by adding sperm to the pellet, then culture in a dish and return to the CO₂ incubator for about 18-22 hours.

3. In Vitro Culture. Remove presumptive zygotes from the fertilization dish and transfer into a sterile 1.5 mL eppendorf tube. Allow zygotes to form a loose pellet and remove excess media to form a 1:1 ratio of pellet and solution. Rinse the eppendorf tube with TCM-199, place contents into a dish and wash with BSA media. Then culture presumptive zygotes (discard disfigured oocytes, as well as oocytes with yellow colored cytoplasm or vacuolated cytoplasm) in a dual gas incubator (5% CO₂, 5% O₂) at 38.5° C. for about 48 hours.

4. Co-culture. Transfer cleaved zygotes to co-culture dishes comprising the cumulus cells from the mature oocytes and FBS media topped with mineral oil, and incubate in a CO₂ incubator at 38.5° C. until needed.

5. Sperm Motility Evaluations by CASA. A comparison of viewing chambers and slides can be done in a variety of IVOS instruments, which for example only can be a Hamilton-Thorne IVOS (Hamilton-Thorne, Beverly, Mass.). Instrument settings: image capture; frames per second=60; number of frames=30; cell detection; minimum contrast=50; minimum cell size=5; defaults, cell size=5; cell intensity=50; progressive cells, path velocity=50 um/s; straightness≧70%; slow cells (um/s); average path velocity (VAP, <30 um/s), straight-line velocity (VSL, <15 um/s). The CASA motility variables measured can be a percentage of total motile sperm (motile), percentage of progressively motile sperm (progressive), VAO, VSL, curvilinear velocity (VCL, um/s), average lateral head displacement (ALK, um) and the number of times the sperm head crosses the mean path/s (BCF, Hz), straight-line sperm motility (STR, %), and linear sperm motility (LIN, %). See for instance, Lenz, R W, et al., J Anim Sci (2011) 89:383-388, incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

A further aspect of the present invention entails the use of a sperm cell sample treated with an OSR in AI. AI in the present invention includes a method whereby a fresh or frozen thawed sperm cell sample is used to inseminate by way of passage of the semen or sperm sample into the female reproductive tract, with or without an accessorizing tool such as an AI gun, catheter or pipette.

Frozen semen samples may be contained in semen straws, which are thawed before the AI procedure using standard methods. In certain embodiments of the invention, the semen straws contain about 0.25-0.5 ml of fluid and are often sufficient for a single insemination.

To increase the number of offspring that a female can produce, embryo transfer techniques (such as MOET) have been developed and are well known to those skilled in the art. Conventional embryo transfer techniques include injection of females with suitable hormones that cause them to produce multiple eggs (oocytes) in a single estrous cycle. This process is often referred to as superovulation. Each female is then artificially inseminated with a sperm cell sample from a male that is either fresh or has been cryopreserved.

In another aspect of the invention, zygotes and/or embryos from artificially inseminated females can be recovered and then cultured and/or cryopreserved/vitrified.

EXAMPLE 1

One set of semen from each bull was used as a control while to the remaining sets of semen samples were added vitamin B12, as the antioxidant, at respective concentrations of 0.5 mg/ml and 0.25 mg/ml. For each sample, the same concentration of vitamin B12 was added (i) during the staining process, and (ii) in the catch fluid of the collection vessel. Control samples did not contain vitamin B12. Sperm samples were sorted in “High Purity” mode, and the collected sex-sorted sperm were extended with a cryoextender, which in some cases again contained the same concentration of vitamin B12 and the samples were frozen. Three hours after thawing (which is a standard time frame to conduct quality control assessments on sorted frozen thawed sperm samples) the thawed samples were put through CASA, a machine that provides various data on sperm including motility and progressive motility information. The results are shown below in Table 1 and the motility and progressive motility are graphically represented in FIG. 2.

In the tables below: VAP (average path velocity (μm/s)); VSL (straight-line velocity (μm/s)); VCL (curvilinear velocity (μm/s)); ALH (average lateral head displacement (μm)); BCF (the number of times the sperm head crosses the mean path/s in Hz); STR (percent straight-line sperm motility); LIN (percent linear sperm motility); PIA (percent intact acrosomes); motile (percent motile sperm); and progressive (percent progressively motile sperm).

The two step addition results represent treatments with vitamin B12 present at the same indicated concentration in the catch fluid of the collecting vessel and in the cryoprotectant extender prior to freezing the sample only (2 step-freeze; −++); the three step addition results indicate that the same concentration of vitamin B12 was added during the staining step, the collecting step (in the catch fluid of the collecting vessel) and in the cryoprotectant extender prior to freezing the sample (3 step). There is no correlation with regard to randomly assigned names such as “Bull A.” Bull A from Example 5 is not the same bull as Bull A from Example 7.

TABLE 1 Motility (2 step and 3 step) (3 hrs Post-Thaw) Total Motile Prog VAP VSL VCL ALH BCF STR LIN PIA cells (%) Mot (%) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm) (Hz) (%) (%) (%) Bull 1 Control 562 59.5 33.5 54 47 95.5 4 21.5 87.5 51 73.5 0.5 mg/ml, 2 step F 925 63.5 26 56 45 94 4 23 86.5 49 74 0.25 mg/ml, 3 step 815 70.5 40.5 55 48 92 4 23.5 87.5 53 83 Bull 2 Control 529 54.5 41.5 61 53.5 107.5 4.5 23 87.5 51.5 64 0.5 mg/ml, 2 step F 269 70.5 47 77 66 108 4 21.5 85.5 61 84 0.25 mg/ml, 3 step 693 67 53.5 68 55 111.5 4.5 24 87 51 79.5 Bull 3 Control 599 47.5 18 49.5 42.5 84.5 4 20.5 86.5 51.5 52.5 0.5 mg/ml, 2 step F 800 74.5 53.5 56 51 98 4 22.5 84.5 52.5 87 0.25 mg/ml, 3 step 656 70 48.5 59 50 101 4 24 85.5 51 80 Bull 4 Control 602 65.5 33.5 53.5 45.5 89.5 4 23.5 86 52.5 72.5 0.5 mg/ml, 2 step F 874 81.5 50 60 53 109 5 26 83.5 49 88 0.25 mg/ml, 3 step 1059 81 25.5 43 51 88.5 5 23 82.5 47 86 Bull 5 Control 638 49.5 13 45.5 38.5 86.5 5 18 84 45.5 63.5 0.5 mg/ml, 2 step F 842 51 33 50 47 101 5 20.5 84 47 79 0.25 mg/ml, 3 step 787 70 40.5 61 48 106.5 5 21.5 84.5 47 80

EXAMPLE 2

In another series of experiments, the CASA results regarding motility and progressive motility after 4.5 hours after thawing sex-sorted samples against a control are shown below in Table 2. The (2 step-freeze) results indicate that vitamin B12 at the same concentration was present in the catch fluid of the collecting vessel and in the cryoprotectant extender prior to freezing the sample; the (3 step) results indicate that the same concentration of vitamin B12 was added during the staining step, the collecting step (in the catch fluid of the collecting vessel) and in the cryoprotectant extender prior to freezing the sample.

With respect to “Bull A,” the two sets of results shown were obtained on two different days using thawed samples from the same initially sorted batch of sperm. In both cases the concentration of the vitamin B12 was 1 mg/ml. For all other bulls in the table below unless otherwise indicated, the concentration of vitamin B12 added was also 1 mg/ml.

TABLE 2 Motility (4.5 hrs Post-Thaw) Total cells Motile Progressive Bull A control 322 38 0 1 mg/ml - 2 step-F 250 41 8 1 mg/ml - 3 step 287 64 37 Bull A (day 2) control 328 46 4 1 mg/ml - 2 step-F 433 71 31 1 mg/ml - 3 step 487 64 11 Bull B control 298 33 1 1 mg/ml - 2 step-F 316 22 1 1 mg/ml - 3 step 237 59 19 Bull C control 403 52 1 1 mg/ml - 2 step-F 432 76 43 1 mg/ml - 3 step 613 62 2 Bull D control 644 37 3 1 mg/ml - 3 step 400 59 9 Bull E control 653 41 1 1 mg/ml - 3 step 648 52 1 Bull F control 638 39 7 0.5 mg/ml - 3 step 761 51 16 0.25 mg/ml - 3 step 730 60 23 Bull G control 588 41 13 0.5 mg/ml - 3 step 162 65 57 0.25 mg/ml - 3 step 1003 56 32

EXAMPLE 3

In an additional experiment, motility and progressive motility were checked 3.75 hours after thawing a sex sorted semen sample treated with the antioxidant. The OSR was not added to the control sample. The semen sample was derived from a single bull. 0.25 mg/ml concentration of vitamin B12 was added to the test sample during the staining step, the collecting step (in the catch fluid of the collecting vessel) and in the cryoprotectant extender prior to freezing the sample. The results are shown in Table 3 below.

TABLE 3 Motility (3.75 hrs Post-Thaw) Prog Total Motile Mot VAP VSL VCL ALH BCF STR LIN PIA Bull 1 cells (%) (%) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm) (Hz) (%) (%) (%) Control 452 7 0 37 28 71 3 16 74 40 41 0.25 mg/ml, 3 step 536 39 5 40 34 76 5 17 85 45 70

EXAMPLE 4

An experiment was designed to test the effect of OSR treated sperm cells on the development of eggs fertilized with those sperm cells. In this experiment, bull semen from two bulls was sex sorted with flow cytometry, with vitamin B12 present at equal concentrations in the media used to stain the sperm cells, in the catch fluid of the collecting vessel and in the cryoprotectant extender prior to freezing the sex sorted sample (3 step). For each bull, three different concentrations of vitamin B12 were tested: 0.05 mg/ml, 0.15 mg/ml and 0.25 mg/ml. The control samples were not treated with vitamin B 12.

Slaughterhouse oocytes were collected and washed 1× with about 3 mL Hepes washing media and with 1× with TCM-199+10% FBS. The oocytes were then cultured in maturation media for 22 hrs in a CO₂ incubator at 38.5° C. Cumulus cells were trimmed away from matured oocytes, transferred to a fertilization dish, and returned to the CO₂ incubator.

Frozen semen straws were thawed using standard procedures and centrifuged in 800 μL of Pure Sperm gradient at 2500 RPM for 10 minutes in order to remove egg, glycerol and other debris. The supernatant was removed, leaving a loose pellet of live sperm. Pellets were combined using a small amount of fertilization media and repelleted at 1500 RPM for 3 minutes. The supernatant was then carefully removed and the pellet gently mixed. After determining the desired insemination dose, the matured oocytes were then inseminated by adding sperm to the pellet, cultured in a dish and returned to the CO₂ incubator for about 18-22 hours.

Presumptive zygotes were removed from the fertilization dish and transferred into a sterile 1.5 ml eppendorf tube. The zygotes were allowed to form a loose pellet and excess media was removed to form a 1:1 ratio of pellet and solution. The eppendorf tube was vortexed for 90 seconds and then rinsed with TCM-199. The contents were placed into a dish and then washed with BSA media. The presumptive zygotes were then cultured in a dual gas incubator (5% CO₂, 5% O₂) at 38.5° C. for about 48 hours. Cleaved zygotes were then transferred to co-culture dishes comprising the cumulus cells from the mature oocytes and FBS media topped with mineral oil and incubated in a CO₂ incubator at 38.5° C.

Embryos were observed 7 days after IVF to check: Zyg (the number of zygotes put into culture); 4-2C (the number of zygotes that underwent the 2 cell to 4 cell transition 48 hours after IVF); 8C (the number of zygotes with 8 cells 48 hours after IVF); 8C % (the percentage of zygotes having 8 cells 48 hours after IVF); % Clv (percent cleaved 48 hours after IVF); C1 (number of expanded and hatching and hatched blastocysts 7 days after IVF); C1−(number of blastocysts 7 days after IVF); and C2 (number of early blastocysts and compact morulas 7 days after IVF), Total Embs (total number of blastocysts=C1+C1−+C2); Blast % (percent of cultured zygotes resulting in blastocyst formation); Hatch # (the number of embryos shedding the zona palucida in preparation for implantation observed at 8.5 days after IVF); and Hatch % (percentage of embryos that shed the zona). The results are provided in Table 4 below.

TABLE 4 IVF - Embryo/Fertilization (3 step) Total Zyg 4-2C 8C 8C % % Clv C1 C1− C2 Embs Blast % Hatch # Hatch % Bull A Control 96 36 8 8.3 45.8 1 0 5 6 6.3 2 33.3 Control 68 19 7 10.3 38.2 0 0 2 2 2.9 0 0.0 Control 91 31 19 20.9 54.9 2 3 10 15 16.5 5 33.3 Total/Avg 255 86 34 (13.3) (47.1) 3 3 17 23 (9.0) 7 (30.4) 0.05 mg/ml 87 20 3 3.4 26.4 0 0 1 1 1.1 0 0.0 0.05 mg/ml 95 26 9 9.5 36.8 1 0 1 2 2.1 1 50.0 0.05 mg/ml 94 20 11 11.7 33.0 0 3 1 4 4.3 1 25.0 Total/Avg 276 66 23 (8.3) (32.2) 1 3 3 7 (2.5) 2 (28.6) 0.15 mg/ml 89 25 4 4.5 32.6 0 1 4 5 5.6 0 0.0 0.15 mg/ml 90 29 9 10.0 42.2 1 0 4 5 5.6 3 60.0 0.15 mg/ml 91 24 6 6.6 33.0 2 1 4 7 7.7 3 42.9 Total/Avg 270 78 19 (7.0) (35.9) 3 2 12 17 (6.3) 6 (35.3) 0.25 mg/ml 91 33 6 6.6 42.9 0 2 3 5 5.5 2 40.0 0.25 mg/ml 93 38 20 21.5 62.4 4 2 10 16 17.2 10 62.5 0.25 mg/ml 91 26 16 17.6 46.2 2 3 10 15 16.5 6 40.0 Total/Avg 275 97 42 (15.3) (50.5) 6 7 23 36 (13.1) 18 (50.0) Bull B Control 91 15 35 38.5 54.9 3 3 8 14 15.4 9 64.3 Control 90 25 29 32.2 60.0 4 5 9 18 20.0 10 55.6 Control 92 20 33 35.9 57.6 7 6 12 25 27.2 15 60.0 Total/Avg 273 60 97 (35.5) (57.5) 14 14 29 57 (20.9) 34 (59.6) 0.05 mg/ml 90 18 40 44.4 64.4 2 4 13 19 21.1 9 47.4 0.05 mg/ml 92 23 27 29.3 54.3 4 2 9 15 16.3 7 46.7 0.05 mg/ml 93 22 27 29.0 52.7 5 3 13 21 22.6 8 38.1 Total/Avg 275 63 94 (34.2) (57.1) 11 9 35 55 (20.0) 24 (43.6) 0.15 mg/ml 96 21 38 39.6 61.5 6 7 10 23 24.0 17 73.9 0.15 mg/ml 93 32 14 15.1 49.5 2 3 6 11 11.8 6 54.5 0.15 mg/ml 100 21 29 29.0 50.0 4 4 14 22 22.0 9 40.9 Total/Avg 289 74 81 (28.0) (53.6) 12 14 30 56 (19.4) 32 (57.1) 0.25 mg/ml 92 24 34 37.0 63.0 5 3 11 19 20.7 14 73.7 0.25 mg/ml 96 31 23 24.0 56.3 1 3 3 7 7.3 5 71.4 Total/Avg 188 55 57 (30.3) (59.6) 6 6 14 26 (13.8) 19 (73.1)

EXAMPLE 5

A similar experiment as done in Example 4 was done to test the effect of OSR treated sperm cells on the development of eggs fertilized using a higher concentration of the antioxidant, comparing it to one of the earlier used concentrations. Semen samples from two bulls of different breeds (one Holstein; one Jersey) were sex sorted using flow cytometry, again using vitamin B12 as the antioxidant, present at equal concentrations during staining, in the catch fluid of the collecting vessel and in the cryoprotectant extender prior to freezing the sex sorted sample (3 step). For each bull, the two concentrations of vitamin B12 tested were: 0.5 mg/ml and 0.25 mg/ml. The control samples were not treated with vitamin B12. All experimental steps were done the same as in Example 4. The results are shown in Table 5 below.

TABLE 5 IVF - Embryo Fertilization (3 step) Total Zyg 4-2C 8C 8C % % Clv C1 C1− C2 Embs Blast % Hatch # Hatch % Bull A (Holstein) Control 91 25 35 38.5 65.9 3 2 4 9 9.9 3 33.3 Control 93 40 19 20.4 63.4 1 2 3 3.2 0 0.0 Control 98 25 25 25.5 51.0 3 6 5 14 14.3 6 42.9 Total/Avg 282 90 79 28.0 (60.1) 6 9 11 26 (9.2) 9 (34.6) 0.25 mg/ml 97 25 39 40.2 66.0 6 9 5 20 20.6 8 40.0 0.25 mg/ml 97 34 30 30.9 66.0 5 6 5 16 16.5 4 25.0 0.25 mg/ml 97 23 33 34.0 57.7 6 7 6 19 19.6 9 47.4 Total/Avg 291 82 102 35.1 (63.2) 17 22 16 55 (18.9) 21 (38.2) 0.5 mg/ml 94 25 34 36.2 62.8 0 3 3 6 6.4 1 16.7 0.5 mg/ml 95 29 30 31.6 62.1 1 7 7 15 15.8 4 26.7 0.5 mg/ml 93 18 35 37.6 57.0 5 7 8 20 21.5 11 55.0 Total/Avg 282 72 99 35.1 (60.6) 6 17 18 41 (14.5) 16 (39.0) Bull B (Jersey) Control 97 39 39 40.2 80.4 5 5 3 13 13.4 7 53.8 Control 100 22 12 12.0 34.0 4 5 9 9.0 2 22.2 Control 100 22 29 29.0 51.0 2 5 1 8 8.0 3 37.5 Total/Avg 297 83 80 26.9 (55.1) 11 15 4 30 (10.1) 12 (40.0) 0.25 mg/ml 94 25 45 47.9 74.5 5 9 4 18 19.1 12 66.7 0.25 mg/ml 99 36 20 20.2 56.6 7 6 6 19 19.2 6 31.6 0.25 mg/ml 99 17 46 46.5 63.6 5 7 8 20 20.2 9 45.0 Total/Avg 292 78 111 38.0 (64.8) 17 22 18 57 (19.5) 27 (47.4) 0.5 mg/ml 100 40 34 34.0 74.0 4 6 1 11 11.0 5 45.5 0.5 mg/ml 95 31 24 25.3 57.9 5 11 7 23 24.2 6 26.1 0.5 mg/ml 99 15 46 46.5 61.6 8 5 5 18 18.2 9 50.0 Total/Avg 294 86 104 35.4 (64.5) 17 22 13 52 (17.7) 20 (38.5)

EXAMPLE 6

Another experiment similar to Examples 4 and 5 was performed to test the reproducible effect of OSR treated sperm cells regarding a single bull by monitoring the development of embryos. Bull A (Holstein) was sampled three different times; Bull B was sampled five different times; Bull C only one time; all semen samples were subjected to standard sex sorting procedures using flow cytometry with vitamin B12 as the OSR at 0.25 mg/ml during the steps of staining, collection in the catch fluid and prior to cryopreservation (3 step). The control samples were not treated with vitamin B12. All experimental steps were done the same as in Example 4. The results are provided in Table 6, below.

TABLE 6 IVF (3 step) - Reproducibility Total Zyg 4-2C 8C 8C % % Clv C1 C1− C2 Embs Blast % Freeze % Hatch % Bull A (Holstein) Trial 1 Control 507 85 119 23.5 40.2 34 19 31 84 16.6 10.5 0.25 mg/ml 434 92 100 23.0 44.2 27 14 44 85 (19.6) 9.4 Trial 2 Control 993 238 287 28.9 52.9 54 26 86 166 16.7 8.1 0.25 mg/ml 884 204 222 25.1 48.2 81 36 128 245 (27.7) 13.2 Trial 3 Control 907 209 215 23.7 46.7 70 27 90 187 20.6 10.7 0.25 mg/ml 1053 230 285 27.1 48.9 83 39 129 251 (23.8) 11.6 Average - Control (18.2) (9.6) Average - 0.25 mg/ml (24.5) (11.8) Bull B (Holstein) Trial 1 Control 507 85 119 23.5 40.2 34 19 31 84 16.6 10.5 0.25 mg/ml 434 92 100 23.0 44.2 27 14 44 85 (19.6) 9.4 Trial 2 Control 993 238 287 28.9 52.9 54 26 86 166 16.7 8.1 0.25 mg/ml 884 204 222 25.1 48.2 81 36 128 245 (27.7) 13.2 Trial 3 Control 907 209 215 23.7 46.7 70 27 90 187 20.6 10.7 0.25 mg/ml 1053 230 285 27.1 48.9 83 39 129 251 (23.8) 11.6 Trial 4 Control 550 122 177 32.2 54.4 12 19 56 87 15.8 5.6 0.25 mg/ml 595 124 183 30.8 51.6 12 8 52 72 (12.1) 3.4 Trial 5 Control 596 107 159 26.7 44.6 31 21 83 135 22.7 8.7 0.25 mg/ml 636 137 185 29.1 50.6 27 24 79 130 (20.4) 8.0 Average - Control (18.5) (8.8) Average - 0.25 mg/ml (21.7) (9.7) Bull C Trial 1 Control 454 113 265 58.4 83.3 21 17 49 87 (19.2) (8.4) 0.25 mg/ml 509 104 335 65.8 86.2 31 27 62 120 (23.6) (11.4)

EXAMPLE 7

A larger scale experiment was done to further test the reproducibility similar to what was done in Examples 6 and 7, but testing five bulls each three separate times. Semen samples from five bulls were sampled and sex sorted using flow cytometry in accordance with the earlier procedures and treated with 0.25 mg/ml vitamin B12 as the OSR (3 step). The control samples were not treated with vitamin B12.

TABLE 7 Averaged Effect (Holstein and Jersey Mix) Total Zyg 4-2C 8C 8C % % Clv C1 C1− C2 Embs Blast % Hatch # Hatch % Control-A1 993 238 287 28.9 52.9 54 26 86 166 16.7 Control-A2 507 85 119 23.5 40.2 34 19 31 84 16.6 Control-A3 907 209 215 23.7 46.7 70 27 90 187 20.6 Control-B1 96 36 8 8.3 45.8 1 0 5 6 6.3 2 33.3 Control-B2 68 19 7 10.3 38.2 0 0 2 2 2.9 0 0.0 Control-B3 91 31 19 20.9 54.9 2 3 10 15 16.5 5 33.3 Control-C1 91 15 35 38.5 54.9 3 3 8 14 15.4 9 64.3 Control-C2 90 25 29 32.2 60.0 4 5 9 18 20.0 10 55.6 Control-C3 92 20 33 35.9 57.6 7 6 12 25 27.2 15 60.0 Control-D1 97 39 39 40.2 80.4 5 5 3 13 13.4 7 53.8 Control-D2 100 22 12 12.0 34.0 4 5 9 9.0 2 22.2 Control-D3 100 22 29 29.0 51.0 2 5 1 8 8.0 3 37.5 Control-E1 91 25 35 38.5 65.9 3 2 4 9 9.9 3 33.3 Control-E2 93 40 19 20.4 63.4 1 2 3 3.2 0 0.0 Control-E3 98 25 25 25.5 51.0 3 6 5 14 14.3 6 42.9 Total/Avg 3514 851 911 25.9 (50.1) 192 113 268 573 (16.3) 62 (10.8) 0.25-A1 884 204 222 25.1 48.2 81 36 128 245 27.7 0.25-A2 434 92 100 23.0 44.2 27 14 44 85 19.6 0.25-A3 1053 230 285 27.1 48.9 83 39 129 251 23.8 0.25-B1 91 33 6 6.6 42.9 0 2 3 5 5.5 2 40.0 0.25-B2 93 38 20 21.5 62.4 4 2 10 16 17.2 10 62.5 0.25-B3 91 26 16 17.6 46.2 2 3 10 15 16.5 6 40.0 0.25-C1 92 24 34 37.0 63.0 5 3 11 19 20.7 14 73.7 0.25-C2 96 31 23 24.0 56.3 1 3 3 7 7.3 5 71.4 0.25-C3 0.25-D1 94 25 45 47.9 74.5 5 9 4 18 19.1 12 66.7 0.25-D2 99 36 20 20.2 56.6 7 6 6 19 19.2 6 31.6 0.25-D3 99 17 46 46.5 63.6 5 7 8 20 20.2 9 45.0 0.25-E1 97 25 39 40.2 66.0 6 9 5 20 20.6 8 40.0 0.25-E2 97 34 30 30.9 66.0 5 6 5 16 16.5 4 25.0 0.25-E3 97 23 33 34.0 57.7 6 7 6 19 19.6 9 47.4 Total/Avg 3417 838 919 26.9 (51.4) 237 146 372 755 (22.1) 85 (11.3)

EXAMPLE 8

In an additional experiment, post-thaw motility and progressive motility were checked using CASA at 0, 3 and 5 hours after thawing sex sorted semen samples (sorted using flow cytometry) treated with vitamin B12 as the antioxidant. The OSR was not added to the control samples. The semen samples were derived from two Holstein bulls. 0.25 mg/ml concentration of vitamin B 12 was added to the test samples during the staining step, the collecting step (in the catch fluid of the collecting vessel) and in the cryoprotectant extender prior to freezing the sample (3 step). The results are shown in Table 8 below.

TABLE 8 Post-Thaw Motility (3 step) Total Motile Prog VAP VSL VCL ALH BCF STR LIN PIA cells (%) Mot (%) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm) (Hz) (%) (%) (%) Bull A 0 hr Post-Thaw: Bull A - Control 1884 77 53 107 81 211 9 23 76 40 Bull A - Control 1275 74 51 99 75 198 9 24 77 41 90 Average (76) (52) 103 78 205 9 24 77 41 Bull A - 0.25 1074 73 51 89 68 183 8 26 77 40 Bull A - 0.25 1519 69 50 101 78 195 8 27 78 43 90 Average (71) (51) 95 73 189 8 27 78 42 3 hr Post-Thaw: Bull A - Control 1064 48  3 38 29 76 6 14 77 40 56 Bull A - Control 683 53  7 44 36 80 5 17 84 46 63 Average (50)  (5) 41 32.5 78 5.5 15.5 80.5 43 59.5 Bull A - 0.25 870 64 22 48 39 84 8 14 77 41 86 Bull A - 0.25 978 46  7 41 31 83 8 14 77 38 76 Average (55) (15) 45 35 84 8 14 77 40 81 5 hr Post-Thaw: Bull A - Control 903 40  8 14 11 25 3 7 14 9 52 Bull A - Control 517 15  1 12 10 18 2 10 17 18 60 Average   (27.5)   (4.5) 13 10.5 21.5 2.5 8.5 15.5 13.5 56 Bull A - 0.25 708 61 26 17 17 23 2 6 13 12 79 Bull A - 0.25 747 34  7 20 16 28 3 8 14 13 72 Average   (47.5)   (16.5) 18.5 16.5 25.5 2.5 7 13.5 12.5 75.5 Bull B 0 hr Post-Thaw: Bull B - Control 1878 73 57 88 73 153 7 27 83 49 Bull B - Control 1706 72 54 83 69 142 6 28 84 51 90 Average (73)   (55.5) 85.5 71 148 7 28 84 50 Bull B - 0.25 1804 79 58 85 70 145 6 28 83 51 Bull B - 0.25 1150 79 54 81 67 143 6 29 84 51 90 Average (79) (56) 83 69 144 6 29 84 51 3 hr Post-Thaw: Bull B - Control 666 30 10 39 25 80 8 16 66 33 60 Bull B - Control 670 50 12 45 37 85 6 16 82 44 72 Average (50) (11) 42 31 82.5 7 16 74 38.5 66 Bull B - 0.25 928 56 18 50 39 96 6 18 80 42 83 Bull B - 0.25 772 42 12 46 37 89 6 18 80 42 82 Average (49) (15) 48 38 93 6 18 80 42 82.5 5 hr Post-Thaw: Bull B - Control 539  0  0 40 16 52 0 26 40 31 46 Bull B - Control 609  0  0 35 26 44 0 71 75 39 61 Average  (0)  (0) 37.5 21 48 0 48.5 57.5 35 53.5 Bull B - 0.25 902 43  4 41 28 85 7 14 70 34 83 Bull B - 0.25 721 21  0 38 21 70 4 14 57 32 73 Average (32)  (2) 39.5 24.5 77.5 5.5 14 63.5 33 78

EXAMPLE 9

In an additional experiment, motility and progressive motility were checked at 0 hours and 3 hours after thawing sex sorted semen samples (sorted using flow cytometry) treated with the antioxidant, vitamin B12. The OSR was not added to the control sample. The semen samples were derived from two different breeds of bull, one a Holstein the other Texas Longhorn. 0.25 mg/ml concentration of vitamin B12 was added to the test samples either (i) during the staining step (1 step-stain); (ii) the staining step and the collecting step (in the catch fluid of the collecting vessel) (2 step-stain); (iii) in the staining step, the collecting step and the freezing step (in the cryoprotectant extender prior to freezing the sample) (3 step)—Table 9 (A) for 3 hr, and (B) for 0 hr; or (iv) only prior to the cryopreservation step (1 step-freeze)—Table 9 (C) for 3 hr.

TABLE 9 (A) 3 hr Post-Thaw Motility (3 step; 2 step-stain; 1 step-stain) Total Motile Prog VAP VSL VCL ALH BCF STR LIN PIA cells (%) Mot (%) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm) (Hz) (%) (%) (%) Bull 1 (TL) 3 hr Post-Thaw Control (12)  (3) 42 35 77 3 19 83 46 23 3 step (+ + +) 42 25 55 47 101 5 23 84 48 73 2 step-stain (+ + −) 25  9 47 41 85 5 21 87 49 47 1 step-stain (+ − −) 37 23 56 47 84 5 16 85 57 52 Bull 2 (Jersey) 3 hr Post-Thaw Control (72) (63) 70 59 108 5 19 85 56 72 3 step (+ + +) 75 70 81 74 124 5 22 88 58 80 2 step-stain (+ + −) 57 35 60 50 105 5 19 84 48 78 1 step-stain (+ − −) 47 32 59 49 98 5 19 84 51 71 Average Avg - Control (42) (33) 56 47 92 4 19 84 51 48 3 step (+ + +) 58 47 68 60 112 5 23 86 53 77 2 step-stain (+ + −) 41 22 53 45 95 5 20 85 48 63 1 step-stain (+ − −) 42 28 57 48 91 5 18 85 54 61

TABLE 9 (B) 0 hr Post-Thaw Motility (3 step; 2 step-stain; 1 step-stain) Total Motile Prog VAP VSL VCL ALH BCF STR LIN PIA cells (%) Mot (%) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm) (Hz) (%) (%) (%) Bull 1 (TL) 0 hr Post-Thaw Control   (58.5)   (49.5) 93.5 81.0 161.5 7.0 26.0 86.5 52.5 3 step (+ + +) 76 60 89.5 79.5 154.5 7.0 27.5 89.0 56.5 2 step-stain (+ + −) 57 48 96.0 84.0 168.0 7.0 25.5 87.5 52.0 1 step-stain (+ − −)   60.5 55 95.0 83.5 167.0 7.0 26.5 88.5 52.0 Bull 2 (Jersey) 0 hr Post-Thaw Control (79) (68) 105.0 89.0 179.0 7.0 26.0 86.0 53.0 3 step (+ + +) 70   57.7 94.5 82.0 165.5 6.5 30.0 86.5 52.0 2 step-stain (+ + −) 74 67 97.0 85.0 170.0 7.0 27.0 88.0 52.0 1 step-stain (+ − −) 80 71 104.0 88.0 189.0 8.0 26.0 85.0 49.0

TABLE 9 (C) 3 hr Post-Thaw Motility (1 step-freeze) Bull 3 Total Motile Prog Mot VAP VSL VCL ALH BCF STR LIN PIA 3 hr Post-Thaw Cells (%) (%) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm/s) (μm) (Hz) (%) (%) (%) Control 418 20 0 38 26 67 14 12 63 Control 238 29 0 35 23 53 0 14 59 Avg - Control 656   (24.5) (0) 36.5 24.5 60 7 13 61 1 step-freeze (− − +) 384 50 10  43 35 80 5 17 63 1 step-freeze (− − +) 385 59 17  48 40 86 5 19 83 1 step-freeze (− − +) 210 32 4 41 31 75 6 13 67 1 step-freeze (− − +) 301 45 11  45 33 81 6 13 85 Avg - 1 step-frz 1280   (46.5)  (10.5) 44.25 34.75 80.5 5.5 15.5 74.5

EXAMPLE 10

An additional experiment was conducted to assess the pregnancy rate of female bovines inseminated with sorted sperm cell samples treated with an antioxidant. Semen samples from two bulls were sex sorted using the protocol described above. 0.25 mg/ml concentration of vitamin B12 was added to the test samples during the staining step, the collecting step (in the catch fluid of the collecting vessel) and the freezing step (3 step).

Frozen semen straws containing sex sorted sperm cell samples were thawed using standard procedures. An artificial insemination (AI) gun was warmed as needed to approach body temperature of the recipient, and a straw was placed in the barrel of the insemination gun. The sealed end of the straw was cut off and a plastic sheath was placed over the straw and gun for hygienic purposes. The female was previously placed in a restraining shoot for insemination. The gun was threaded through the vagina and cervix and semen distributed in the uterine body. 384 females were inseminated, each inseminated with a single sperm cell dose, and each dose containing 2.1 million sperm cells in 0.25 ml. Pregnancy checks were made 33-40 days post insemination with an ultrasound machine. The results are shown in Table 10 below.

TABLE 10 Pregnancies (3 step) Inseminations Percent Pregnancy Bull A Control 87 32.8 0.25 mg/ml 100 35.6 Bull B Control 99 30.9 0.25 mg/ml 98 27.0 Total/Average Control 186 (31.9) Total/Average 0.25 mg/ml 198 (31.3)

EXAMPLE 11

Additional pregnancy field trials were performed using the sex-sorted semen treated with vitamin B12 at 0.25 mg/ml added to the test samples during the staining step, the collecting step and again in the freezing step (3-step), as done in Example 10 was evaluated another time looking using semen from five different Holstein bulls. Each semen sample was split into control and vitamin B12 (0.25 mg/ml) treatment groups, and later inseminated into primiparous recipient heifers. Pregnancy checks were made 33-40 days post insemination using ultrasound. The results are shows in Table 11 below.

TABLE 11 Pregnancies (3 step) Antioxidant Inseminations Percent Pregnancy Bull A Control 27.9 0.25 mg/ml 28.4 Bull B Control 26.1 0.25 mg/ml 28.0 Bull C Control 32.8 0.25 mg/ml 35.6 Bull D Control 26.0 0.25 mg/ml 30.7 Bull E Control 50.0 0.25 mg/ml 57.0 Total/Average Control 499 (32.6) Total/Average 0.25 mg/ml 374 (35.9)

EXAMPLE 12

The levels of DNA fragmentation were also screened using a DNA fragmentation ‘Halomax for animals’ kit (Halotech DNA, sl, Madrid, Spain) to determine if there were any advantageous effects of using the antioxidants during the staining and processing of sex-sorted sperm. Two different breeds of cattle, Jersey and Holstein, were examined using two different concentrations of antioxidant, 0.25 mg/ml and 0.5 mg/ml of vitamin B12 with the 3 step protocol adding the same concentration of OSR during cell staining, in the collection catch fluid and prior to cryopreservation. One of the bulls was used to evaluate the effect of addition or omission of OSR at one or more of the sperm sorting steps. Motility and the level of DNA fragmentation were both recorded. The results are shown in Table 12 below.

TABLE 12 DNA Fragmentation (1 step-stain, 2 step, 3 step) % Motility % DNA Fragmentation 0 hr 3 hr 0 hr 24 hr 48 hr Bull A (Jersey) Control 57 17 1 1 1.7 0.25 mg/ml 72 51 0.3 0.3 0.7  0.5 mg/ml 60 42 0.3 0.7 1.3 Bull B (Holstein) Control 62 32 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.25 mg/ml 67 32 0 0.3 0.3  0.5 mg/ml 79 48 0.3 0.3 0.7 Bull C (Jersey) Trial 1 Control 79 72 1 1 1 3 step (+ + +) 70 75 0 0.3 0.3 2 step-stain (+ + −) 74 57 0.3 1 1 1 step-stain (+ − −) 80 47 0.7 1 1.3 Trial 2 Control 59 12 0.3 1.7 1.7 3 step (+ + +) 76 42 0.3 0.3 0.7 2 step-stain (+ + −) 57 25 0.3 0.7 0.7 1 step-stain (+ − −) 61 37 0.7 1 1

EXAMPLE 13

The effect of OSR on motility was evaluated as a function of the concentration of the sex-sorted sperm in the frozen straw. Tests were performed using vitamin B12 as the OSR at three different concentrations of the antioxidant: 0.15 mg/ml; 0.25 mg/ml and 0.35 mg/ml; all were added to the test samples during the staining step, the collecting step and again in the freezing step (3-step), as done in Example 8. Holstein sperm was evaluated at three sperm cell concentrations based upon total number of sperm per straw: 1 million sperm/straw; 2.1 million sperm/straw; and 5 million sperm/straw. Motility was recorded 3 hr post-thaw.

A Jersey sperm sample was also evaluated in the same manner using 0.15 mg/ml or 0.25 mg/ml vitamin B12 at each of the three stages (3 step), but only at the 2.1 million sperm/straw concentration. The results are shown in Table 13.

TABLE 13 Frozen Sperm Cell Concentration (3 step) Motile Prog VAP VSL VCL ALH BCF STR LIN PIA (Holstein) 1M/straw Control 20 4 40 32 76 3 15 78 42 43 .15 mg/ml 48 18 48 42 81 4 12 88 53 66 .25 mg/ml 48 29 55 47 92 4 22 87 53 58 .35 mg/ml 65 46 58 51 94 4 23 88 55 70 2.1M/straw Control 28 2 39 33 73 6 16 85 46 41 .15 mg/ml 49 10 44 38 79 5 18 86 48 72 .25 mg/ml 48 18 46 40 81 5 20 87 50 76 .35 mg/ml 46 30 58 51 99 5 23 88 53 60 5M/straw Control 20 1 39 29 69 7 13 74 43 46 .25 mg/ml 24 2 41 28 69 7 14 70 42 68 .35 mg/ml 28 3 41 32 68 7 14 69 43 69  .5 mg/ml 14 3 43 30 71 6 15 70 43 50 (Jersey) 2.1M/straw Control 25 2 37 28 55 2 11 76 52 53 .15 mg/ml 25 4 42 35 75 6 15 84 47 63 .25 mg/ml 48 20 51 43 87 5 20 85 50 78

EXAMPLE 14

The effect of a different OSR on bovine sperm motility was evaluated after zero hour and a three hour post-thaw period. The OSR, α-tocopheryl, a form of Vitamin E, was purchased as ‘polyoxyethanyl-α-tocopheryl sebacate’ in a 15% stock solution (Aldrich). Tests were performed using α-tocopheryl as the OSR, at three different concentrations: 0.01 mg/ml; 0.1 mg/ml and 0.5 mg/ml; all were added to the test samples during the staining step, the collecting step and again in the freezing step (3-step), as done in the prior Examples. Sex-sorted Holstein sperm was evaluated using a standard sperm concentration of 2.1 million sperm/straw processed from three separate bulls. Motility of the treated samples were compared to untreated controls and recorded at 0 hr and 3 hr post-thaw.

TABLE 14 Motility with α-tocopheryl (vitamin E) (3 step) Total cells Motile Prog VAP VSL VCL ALH BCF STR LIN Holstein 0 hr Post-Thaw Bull A Control 548 56 25 75 52 151 7 22 74 39 0.01 617 72 17 100 49 201 10 20 56 27 0.1 458 73 33 99 62 217 9 22 66 32 0.5 424 63 36 97 68 214 9 22 72 34 Bull B Control 548 56 25 75 52 151 7 22 74 39 0.01 617 72 17 100 49 201 10 20 56 27 0.1 458 73 33 99 62 217 9 22 66 32 0.5 424 63 36 97 68 214 9 22 72 34 Bull C (1) Control 280 50 30 66 51 140 7 20 78 39 0.01 530 59 39 89 68 188 10 20 76 38 0.1 518 63 35 86 61 196 10 20 72 33 0.5 269 30 17 75 53 179 8 22 72 31 Bull C (2) Control 364 23 12 65 54 116 5 25 82 49 0.01 347 36 27 86 78 140 6 26 90 57 0.1 822 27 18 84 75 149 6 25 88 52 0.5 764 29 18 74 64 130 7 28 87 55 Holstein 3 hr Post-Thaw A-toc Bull A Control 260 25 6 39 33 71 5 16 83 47 0.01 253 64 20 51 42 92 5 21 84 49 0.1 297 62 32 54 46 101 5 22 86 48 0.5 235 54 29 60 51 106 5 24 85 49 Bull B Control 309 29 8 46 37 83 6 19 82 46 0.01 126 28 9 54 39 103 4 21 76 41 0.1 154 14 4 56 36 100 6 18 73 38 0.5 151 36 10 57 41 104 5 22 77 44 Bull C (1) Control 200 14 2 40 33 77 5 18 83 44 0.01 222 19 3 41 38 60 4 29 93 70 0.1 155 15 5 49 41 94 7 21 84 45 0.5 82 26 13 50 44 89 5 18 87 50 Bull C (2) Control 207 2 0 19 15 26 1 11 73 27 0.01 270 6 0 35 21 55 0 13 60 39 0.1 658 4 0 38 29 63 1 8 76 46 0.5 278 2 0 37 21 64 0 14 55 33

EXAMPLE 15

The effect of a third OSR on bovine sperm motility was evaluated after zero hour, three hour and six hour post-thaw periods. Alpha-ketoglutarate (AKG) was freshly made and used at three different concentrations: 0.25 mg/ml; 0.35 mg/ml and 0.45 mg/ml; all were added to the test samples during the staining step, the collecting step and again in the freezing step (3-step), as done in the prior Examples. Sex-sorted Holstein and Jersey bovine sperm were evaluated using a standard concentration of 2.1 M sperm/straw. Motility of the treated samples was compared to untreated controls at 0 hr, 3 hr and 6 hr post-thaw.

TABLE 15 Alpha-keto Glutarate (AKG) (3 step) Motile Prog VAP VSL VCL ALH BCF STR LIN PIA Holstein - 0 hr control 41 16 69 44 143 8 21 66 34 .25 mg/ml 91 75 104 81 185 8 27 82 48 .35 mg/ml 80 65 94 80 165 7 29 85 51 .45 mg/ml 86 75 98 88 162 7 30 89 57 Holstein - 3 hr control 4 0 36 24 53 0 10 67 48 44 .25 mg/ml 77 60 99 79 176 7 26 81 45 89 .35 mg/ml 63 48 85 70 145 6 25 83 50 80 .45 mg/ml 60 56 94 80 145 5 24 85 56 80 Holstein - 3 hr control 30 7 40 30 68 3 13 74 46 44 .25 mg/ml 71 55 96 77 169 6 26 81 47 89 .35 mg/ml 64 38 69 57 117 5 21 84 50 80 .45 mg/ml 60 50 90 75 144 6 25 84 53 80 Holstein - 6 hr control 4 0 38 23 55 0 12 61 42 56 .25 mg/ml 36 7 44 33 87 6 17 76 39 73 .35 mg/ml 58 7 42 32 80 7 16 76 40 85 .45 mg/ml 52 22 55 46 96 5 22 82 48 79 Holstein - 6 hr control 4 0 38 23 55 0 12 61 42 56 .25 mg/ml 36 7 44 33 87 6 17 76 39 73 .35 mg/ml 58 7 42 32 80 7 16 76 40 85 .45 mg/ml 52 22 55 46 96 5 22 82 48 79 Jersey - 0 hr control 72 60 82 72 141 6 25 87 53 .25 mg/ml 67 51 83 68 152 7 24 83 48 .35 mg/ml 57 43 79 63 146 6 25 82 47 .45 mg/ml 81 66 81 70 133 6 27 87 56 Jersey - 3 hr control 13 1 36 24 65 2 14 66 38 42 .25 mg/ml 33 16 65 49 117 5 24 79 46 62 .35 mg/ml 26 10 59 46 110 6 25 80 45 54 .45 mg/ml 59 25 67 50 66 6 25 78 45 71

EXAMPLE 16

The effect of combining two antioxidants on bovine sperm motility was evaluated after zero hour, three hour and six hour post-thaw periods. Vitamin B12 was used at 0.25 mg/ml and fresh alpha-ketoglutarate (AKG) was used at 0.35 mg/ml. Either vitamin B12 or AKG or both treatments were added at the designated concentrations during the staining step, the collecting step and again in the freezing step (3-step), as done earlier. Sex-sorted sperm from three Jersey bulls were evaluated using standard 2.1 M sperm/straw. Motility of the treated samples was compared to untreated controls at 0 hr, 3 hr and 6 hr post-thaw.

TABLE 16 Combination AKG, Vitamin B12, and Combination (3 step) Motile PROG VAP VSL VCL ALH BCF STR LIN Jersey 1 - 0 hr Control 75 67 99 87 162 6 30 88 56 B12 - 0.25 mg/ml 88 78 97 87 157 6 33 89 58 AKG - 0.35 mg/ml 87 75 93 81 148 6 31 88 57 COMBO 78 69 93 83 149 6 32 89 57 Jersey 1 - 3 hr Control 43 5 41 33 74 6 15 56 46 B12 - 0.25 mg/ml 53 34 58 51 93 4 23 87 55 AKG - 0.35 mg/ml 60 44 82 67 136 5 27 83 50 COMBO 51 36 79 63 129 5 25 80 50 Jersey 1 - 6 hr Control 2 1 48 38 58 3 8 75 64 B12 - 0.25 mg/ml 37 2 38 28 61 4 15 73 48 AKG - 0.35 mg/ml 36 18 50 42 90 4 22 82 46 COMBO 35 6 45 34 81 5 17 76 43 Jersey 2 - 3 hr Control 18 1 35 22 57 5 13 61 38 B12 - 0.25 mg/ml 66 30 51 43 93 5 18 84 47 AKG - 0.35 mg/ml 64 50 78 62 117 5 19 82 56 COMBO 50 38 72 57 124 5 24 80 48 Jersey 2 - 6 hr Control 1 0 16 16 35 0 0 50 23 B12 - 0.25 mg/ml 24 1 36 24 51 1 17 65 47 AKG - 0.35 mg/ml 44 5 42 36 68 2 17 86 54 COMBO 46 18 61 46 111 5 21 77 44 Jersey 3 - 0 hr Control 80 60 100 80 186 8 26 81 46 B12 - 0.25 mg/ml 83 70 89 76 160 7 27 85 51 AKG - 0.35 mg/ml 86 73 95 82 170 7 27 85 50 COMBO 89 74 99 81 177 7 28 84 49 Jersey 3 - 3 hr Control 64 22 47 38 88 6 16 81 45 B12 - 0.25 mg/ml 73 52 64 52 104 10 20 81 51 AKG - 0.35 mg/ml 80 44 69 53 118 6 19 79 47 COMBO 77 30 56 44 107 7 19 79 42 Jersey 3 - 6 hr Control 16 0.5 38 24 54 1 17 64 47 B12 - 0.25 mg/ml 44 1 37 24 56 3 14 66 44 AKG - 0.35 mg/ml 79 11 46 33 84 6 15 74 41 COMBO 72 12 49 34 98 8 16 71 35

EXAMPLE 17

In an additional experiment, motility and progressive motility of female and male sex-sorted Deer sperm were checked at 0, 1 and 3 hours after thawing the sex sorted semen samples that were treated with the antioxidant, vitamin B12 at two concentrations: 0.25 mg/ml and 0.35 mg/ml; all samples were treated during staining, catch and prior to cryopreservation (3 step). The OSR was not added to the control sample. The semen samples were derived from two white tailed bucks. Each sample was sorted for both male and female enriched populations of sperm.

TABLE 17 Deer (male and female) - Vitamin B12 (3 step) TOTAL MOTILE PROG VAP VSL VCL ALH BCF STR 0 HR Buck A FEMALE CONTROL 1887 74 53 85 67 157 7 24 78 0.25 2803 82 53 83 62 157 7 24 74 0.35 2484 84 55 92 68 169 7 24 74 MALE CONTROL 2939 81 55 94 70 178 7 24 76 0.25 3036 76 49 91 66 173 7 24 73 0.35 2448 86 54 98 71 181 8 24 73 Buck B FEMALE CONTROL 2025 80 36 92 56 185 8 22 64 0.25 1531 82 40 91 56 179 7 22 65 0.35 1859 89 43 105 69 198 8 23 66 MALE CONTROL 2114 85 39 103 62 202 8 22 63 0.25 1169 81 35 109 63 219 8 23 61 0.35 1658 89 46 103 67 197 8 23 66 1 HR Buck A FEMALE CONTROL 1286 64 29 86 57 170 8 21 68 0.25 1380 78 41 97 64 185 8 21 67 0.35 1808 80 31 109 68 216 9 22 63 MALE CONTROL 1612 67 27 71 50 141 7 22 73 0.25 1817 57 23 64 45 125 7 22 70 0.35 3169 85 52 105 75 198 8 23 72 Buck B FEMALE CONTROL 1371 81 26 65 43 127 6 19 68 0.25 1541 83 28 84 51 158 8 19 64 0.35 2637 92 32 116 66 214 9 20 58 MALE CONTROL 1520 84 48 86 57 169 6 23 70 0.25 1086 84 46 104 66 203 8 22 67 0.35 1881 92 46 112 71 216 8 22 65 2 HR Buck A FEMALE CONTROL 1188 58 16 58 42 114 7 18 74 0.25 1045 75 40 97 65 190 9 20 68 0.35 877 54 19 68 50 137 8 20 75 MALE CONTROL 1325 59 13 51 38 101 6 19 77 0.25 1523 56 24 66 46 130 6 22 70 0.35 1797 58 39 101 75 193 8 23 76 Buck B FEMALE CONTROL 1125 73 15 56 38 111 7 18 69 0.25 834 64 11 53 36 106 7 16 68 0.35 1378 85 26 100 57 190 8 19 60 MALE CONTROL 1603 77 37 66 46 126 6 19 73 0.25 866 78 47 95 67 177 7 21 71 0.35 1760 89 41 78 51 149 7 20 70

As can be easily understood from the foregoing, the basic concepts of the present invention may be embodied in a variety of ways. As such, the particular embodiments, elements, terms, or expressions disclosed by the description, or shown in the figures accompanying this application are not intended to be limiting, but rather are examples of the numerous and varied embodiments generically encompassed by the invention or its equivalents with respect to any particular element thereof. In addition, the specific description of a single embodiment or element of the invention may not explicitly describe all embodiments or elements possible; many alternatives are implicitly disclosed by the description and figures.

It should be understood that each element of an apparatus or each step of a method may be described by an apparatus term or method term. Such terms can be substituted where desired to make explicit the implicitly broad coverage to which this invention is entitled. As example, it should be understood that all steps of a method may be disclosed as an action, a means for taking that action, or as an element which causes that action. Similarly, each element of an apparatus may be disclosed as the physical element or the action which that physical element facilitates. As another example, the disclosure of a “sorter” should be understood to encompass disclosure of the act of “sorting,” whether explicitly discussed or not, and conversely, effective disclosure of the act of “sorting” should be understood to encompass disclosure of a “sorter.” Such alternative terms for each element or step are to be understood to be explicitly included in the description.

In addition, it should be understood that unless utilization of a specific term in this application is inconsistent with common use and interpretation of that term, dictionary definitions should be understood to be included in the description for each term as contained in the Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, second edition, each definition hereby incorporated by reference.

Moreover, for the purposes of the present invention, the term “a” or “an” before an item also refers to one or more of that item; for example, “a container” refers to one or more of the containers. As such, the terms “a” or “an”, “one or more” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein. Further, as used herein the term “or” means “and/or” unless specifically indicated otherwise.

The background section of this patent application provides a statement of the field of endeavor to which the invention pertains. This section may also incorporate or contain paraphrasing of certain United States patents, patent applications, publications, or subject matter of the claimed invention useful in relating information, problems, or concerns about the state of technology to which the invention is drawn toward. It is not intended that any United States patent, patent application, publication, statement or other information cited or incorporated herein be interpreted, construed or deemed to be admitted as prior art with respect to the present invention, and the terms used in those earlier documents which may be similarly used in this disclosure, shall not alter the intended definition of those same terms as defined or intended herein.

The claims set forth in this specification, if any, are hereby incorporated by reference as part of the description of the current invention, and the applicant expressly reserves the right to use all or a portion of such incorporated content as additional description to support any or all of the claims or any element or component thereof. The applicant further expressly reserves the right to move any portion or all of the incorporated content of such claims or any element or component thereof from the description into the claims, or vice versa, as necessary to define the invention for which protection is sought by this application or by any subsequent application or continuation, division, or continuation-in-part application thereof, or to obtain any benefit for reduction in fees in compliance with relevant patent laws, rules, or regulations of any country or treaty, and such incorporate content shall survive the entire pendency of this application as well as any subsequent continuation, division, continuation-in-part application filings or any reissue or extension thereof.

The claims set forth in this specification are intended to describe the metes and bounds of a limited number of the preferred embodiments of the invention and are not to be construed as the broadest embodiment of the invention or a complete listing of embodiments of the invention that may be claimed. The applicant does not waive any right to develop further claims based upon the description set forth above as a part of any continuation, division, or continuation-in-part, or similar application. 

1. A method of treating sperm cells during processing to improve cell integrity comprising the steps of: a. providing a sperm cell sample; b. processing the sperm cell sample; and c. adding one or more OSRs in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml to the sperm cell sample to form a sperm cell composition.
 2. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising the step of holding the sperm cell composition at a holding temperature without freezing for a period of time in the range of about 2 seconds to about a week following addition of the one or more OSRs.
 3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the holding period is selected from a range selected from the group of: about 2 sec to about 3 min; about 3 min to about 15 min; about 15 min to about 1 hr; about 1 hr to about 8 hrs; about 8 hrs to about 12 hrs; about 12 hrs to about 18 hrs; about 8 hrs to about 24 hrs; about 24 hrs to about 48 hrs; about 48 hrs to about 72 hrs; about 72 hrs to about 96 hrs; about 96 hrs to about 120 hrs; about 120 hrs to about 144 hrs; and about 144 hrs to about 168 hrs.
 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the holding temperature is in the range of 4° C. and 39° C.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the holding temperature is in the range of about 4° C. to 16° C.
 6. A method of transporting processed sperm cells comprising the steps of: a. forming a sperm cell composition according to claim 1; and b. transporting the sperm cell composition to a second location.
 7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein processing the sperm cell sample comprises two or more processing steps selected from the group of: collecting a semen sample; holding; transporting; buffering; chilling; warming; staining; diluting; concentrating; exciting with a laser; electronic charging; deflecting; ablating; collecting; shaking; oscillating; magnetically separating; oxygenating; labeling; precipitating; centrifuging; resuspending; mixing; dialyzing; cryostabilizing; freezing; thawing; vitrifying; culturing; inseminating; microinjecting; microfluidic processing; microchip processing; jet and air processing; flow cytometry processing; and similar handling techniques. 8-13. (canceled)
 14. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sperm cell sample has been frozen and thawed prior to being further processed.
 15. The method as claimed in any one of claims 1-14, wherein the method further comprises the step of freezing the sperm cell composition to form a frozen sperm cell composition. 16-19. (canceled)
 20. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the OSRs are selected from the group comprising: catalase, SOD, an SOD mimic, glutathione, glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase, pyruvate, mercaptoethanol, BHT, lipoic acid, flavins, quinines, vitamin K (and related vitamers), vitamin B12, vitamin B12 vitamers, vitamin E (and related vitamers), tocopherols, tocotrienols, α-tocopheryl, alpha ketoglutarate (AKG), malondialdehyde (MDA), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and biologically active derivatives thereof.
 21. The method as claimed in claim 20, wherein the OSRs are selected from the group comprising: vitamin B12, vitamin B12 vitamers, vitamin E, vitamin E vitamers, tocopherols, tocotrienols, α-tocoperyl, alpha ketoglutarate, and derivatives thereof.
 22. The method as claimed in claim 20, wherein the one or more OSRs are added to the sperm cell composition at any given step whereby the added OSR is added to be in the range of 0.01 to 5.0 mg/ml in the sperm cell composition.
 23. The method as claimed in claim 20, wherein the final concentration of the added OSR in the sperm cell composition is in the range selected from the group of: 0.01 to 5.0 mg/ml; 0.01 to 0.25 mg/ml; 0.01 to 0.5 mg/ml; 0.01 to 1 mg/ml; 0.01 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.01 to 5 mg/ml; 0.05 to 0.1 mg/ml; 0.05 to 1.0 mg/ml; 0.05 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.1 to 0.25 mg/ml; 0.1 to 0.5 mg/ml; 0.1 to 1 mg/ml; 0.1 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.1 to 5 mg/ml; 0.15 to 0.45 mg/ml; 0.15 to 0.5 mg/ml; 0.25 to 0.35 mg/ml; 0.25 to 0.5 mg/ml; 0.25 to 1 mg/ml; 0.25 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.25 to 5 mg/ml; 0.35 to 0.5 mg/ml; 0.35 to 1 mg/ml; 0.35 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.35 to 5 mg/ml; 0.5 to 1 mg/ml; 0.5 to 2.5 mg/ml; 0.5 to 5 mg/ml; 1 to 2.5 mg/ml; and 1 to 5 mg/ml.
 24. The method as claimed in claim 23, wherein the final concentration of the added OSR in the sperm cell composition is selected from the group of: about 0.05 mg/ml; about 0.1 mg/ml; about 0.15 mg/ml; about 0.25 mg/ml; about 0.35 mg/ml; about 0.45 mg/ml; and about 0.5 mg/ml.
 25. The method as claimed in claim 24, wherein the final concentration of the added OSR in the sperm cell composition is about 0.15 mg/ml, about 0.25 mg/ml or about 0.35 mg/ml.
 26. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein processing constitutes two or more processing steps and wherein the OSR is added at one or more of the processing steps. 27-116. (canceled)
 117. A sperm cell composition comprising: a. a sperm cell sample; and b. at least one OSR having a concentration in the range of 0.01 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml. 118-119. (canceled)
 120. The sperm cell composition of claim 117, further comprising an extender or media.
 121. The sperm cell composition of claim 117, further comprising a cryoprotectant.
 122. The sperm cell composition of claim 117, wherein the OSR is selected from the group comprising: catalase, SOD, an SOD mimic, glutathione, glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase, pyruvate, mercaptoethanol, BHT, lipoic acid, flavins, quinines, vitamin K (and related vitamers), vitamin B12, vitamin B12 vitamers, vitamin E (and related vitamers), tocopherols, tocotrienols, α-tocopheryl, alpha ketoglutarate (AKG), malondialdehyde (MDA), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and biologically active derivatives thereof.
 123. The sperm cell composition of claim 122, wherein the OSR is selected from the group comprising: vitamin B12, vitamin B12 vitamers, vitamin E, vitamin E vitamers, tocopherols, tocotrienols, α-tocoperyl, alpha ketoglutarate, and derivatives thereof.
 124. The sperm cell composition of claim 122, wherein the concentration of the added OSR is in the range of 0.01 to 0.5 mg/ml in the sperm cell sample.
 125. The sperm cell composition of claim 124, wherein the concentration of the added OSR is selected from the group of: about 0.01; about 0.05 mg/ml; about 0.1 mg/ml; about 0.15 mg/ml; about 0.25 mg/ml; about 0.35 mg/ml; about 0.45 mg/ml; and about 0.5 mg/ml.
 126. The sperm cell composition of claim 117, wherein the sperm cell sample is unfrozen.
 127. The sperm cell composition of claim 117, wherein the sperm cell sample is frozen.
 128. The sperm cell composition of claim 117, wherein the sperm cell sample is derived from a human, bovine, swine, ovine, equine, deer, elk, buffalo, canine, feline, chimpanzee, gorilla, whale, dolphin and other marine mammals. 129-131. (canceled)
 132. The processed sperm cell sample as claimed in claim 1, has been frozen and thawed. 133-140. (canceled)
 141. The method as claimed in claim 127, wherein one or more OSRs are added in the cryogenic preparation step prior to freezing. 142-144. (canceled)
 145. The method as claimed in claim 117, wherein at least one OSR is a vitamer of vitamin B12 and added at the concentration of 0.25 mg/ml in the final sperm cell composition.
 146. The method as claimed in claim 117, wherein at least one OSR is a vitamer of vitamin B12 and added at a concentration in the range of 0.15 mg/ml to 0.5 mg/ml in the final sperm cell composition.
 147. The method as claimed in claim 117, wherein at least one OSR is a vitamer of vitamin E and added at a concentration in the range of 0.15 mg/ml to 0.5 mg/ml in the final sperm cell composition.
 148. The method as claimed in claim 117, wherein at least one OSR is an active form of AKG and added at a concentration in the range of 0.15 mg/ml to 0.5 mg/ml in the final sperm cell composition.
 149. The method as claimed in claim 117, wherein two OSRs are used in combination selected from the group comprising: a vitamer of vitamin B12 added at a concentration in the range of 0.15 mg/ml to 0.5 mg/ml, a vitamer of vitamin E added at a concentration in the range of 0.15 mg/ml to 0.5 mg/ml, and an active derivative of AKG at a concentration in the range of 0.15 mg/ml to 0.5 mg/ml in the sperm cell suspension.
 150. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sperm cell sample contains unwanted cells.
 151. The method as claimed in claim 150, wherein the sperm cell sample is manually ablated to kill unwanted cell types within the sperm cell sample. 